Konur,
O. (2002) Access to e-learning in higher education by disabled students:
current
public policy issues, Paper to be presented at the Third
International
Conference on Networked Learning (a research based
Conference
on e-learning in Higher Education and Lifelong Learning),
26
March- 28 March
2001,
University of Sheffield, Sheffield,
UK.
Key
words: e-learning, disabled students, Special Educational Needs and
Disability
Act (2001, higher education, Internet, collaborative learning, e-university,
learning technologies, communication and information technology, disability
hierarchy.
Abstract
Disabled students have increasingly
participated in higher education in
recent
years. However, a disability hierarchy
has emerged in this
participation
where 47% of students of the total disabled student population
have
medical disabilities with a medical origin such as asthma, chronic
fatigue
syndrome, and multiple sclerosis and
28% of them have learning
disabilities
(reading disabilities, mathematical learning disabilities,
writing
disabilities). Visually and hearing
disabled students comprise
only
8 % of the total disabled student population.
Similarly, mobility disabled
students
(e.g. wheelchair users) and mentally disabled students (students with
clinical
depression, schizophrenia, clinical anxiety etc.) constitute only 6%
of
this population. The access to higher
education has not been regulated and a
laissez
faire policy has been adapted. Particularly, it has
been
notable that higher education has been excluded from the coverage of the
Part
III of the Disability Discrimination Act (1995). However, non-teaching
related
services such as students' union services, residential services have been
covered by the Part III. Instead, a
good practice culture has dominated the higher education sector in this area
and public funds have been distributed on a competitive basis to universities
and colleges. Disabled Students'
Allowances have been made
available
only to full time undergraduate home students. However, the start of the
new
millennium saw a number of changes in this area. First this allowance has been
extended
to all home students including part-time students and postgraduate
students. Next, additional capital funding has been
made available to
universities
and colleges in the form of premium funding and physical capital
funding. But more importantly, the Special
Educational Needs and Disability
Act
was enacted on 11 May 2001. This Act amended the Part IV of the Disability
Discrimination
Act (1995) and brought both rights and duties for the governing bodies of
colleges and universities. For example,
universities would have duties not to treat students less favourably than their
peers in the admission, expulsion, and provision of services starting with
September 2002. Furthermore they would
have additional duties to make reasonable adjustments for disabled students in
admission and services starting with September 2003. They would be required to make reasonable adjustments to the
physical premises starting with September 2004. Disabled students have been provided with a number of reasonable
adjustments to access the curriculum during their studies. The shift to e-learning from paper-based
learning has brought both opportunities and threats for disabled students. Increasingly courses have been adapted to
contain e-learning elements using the e-learning systems such as Blackboard or
WebCT. However, to enable disabled students
to participate in these e-learning systems, it is essential that they are able
to access these systems. The research
on the e-learning for disabled students has been evolving since the early
1990s. The research so far has mainly
focused on the requirements for visually disabled students, such as putting the
screen reading software, the speech synthesis software packages etc. Properly adapted e-learning systems would
have particular importance in opening higher education, professional education
and life-long learning to disabled students.
Students can have access to the learning materials 24 hours a day, they
can communicate with their fellow students and tutors in real time through the
use of the chat room and discussion list facilities in these systems. They can produce and submit their course
work online and invite comments from their fellow students. This paper aims to develop an analysis of
the public policy development regarding access to higher education through the
use of the e-learning systems using a conceptual framework as applied by
[Konur, O. Creating enforceable civil rights for disabled students in higher
education: an institutional theory perspective, Disability and Society 15(7)
pp. 1041-1063]. It is argued the rules of the game matter and therefore the
proper incentive structures for the key players should be designed for a proper
play of the game of access to higher education by disabled students using
e-learning systems.