Where is the Learning in Networked Learning?
Symposium Convenor: Vivien Hodgson
Department of Management Learning and Leadership, Lancaster University,
v.hodgson@lancaster.ac.uk
Symposium Introduction
In this symposium the intention is to bring together a collection of
papers where we will revisit the early description of networked learning
that researchers at particularly Lancaster but also Sheffield University
have worked with since the nineties i.e.
Networked learning is learning in which information and communications
(ICT) is used to promote connections: between one learner and other learners,
between learners and tutors; between a learning community and its learning
resources (Goodyear, P. Banks, S. Hodgson, V. and McConnell, D.)
Each of the papers will focus particularly on the learning aspect of
networked learning and how, in both theory and practice, ideas about the
design, experience and processes of learning are seen and have developed
over the ten years since this description of networked learning was first
written into a JISC research proposal in 1998.
An emphasis of the symposium will be to explore, in more depth, the nature
of the connections that are made within networked learning and the way
these connections have come to be discussed and analysed from a learning
perspective. In particular, the papers pick up on different aspects of
ideas emerging from social practice and socio-cultural theories applied
to conceptualisations of collaborative learning, which have come to be
closely associated with networked learning.
The symposium includes the following papers;
Maria Zenios and Peter Goodyear; Where is the learning
in networked knowledge construction?
Chris Jones; Networked Learning - a social practice
perspective
Thomas Ryberg; The Metaphor of Patchworking as a Viable
Concept in Developing Networked Learning?
Gale Parchoma, and Mary E. Dykes; Bridging Networked
learning between the Knowledge Economy and Higher Education: A philosophical
Approach
Debra Ferreday, D and Vivien Hodgson; The Tyranny
of Participation and collaboration in Networked Learning
Introduction - .pdf
Where is the learning in networked knowledge construction?
Maria Zenios
CSALT/ Educational Research, Lancaster University, m.zenios@lancaster.ac.uk
Peter Goodyear
CoCo Research Centre, University of Sydney, p.goodyear@edfac.usyd.edu.au
Abstract
From the days of Plato until today's information society, knowledge
has been at the core of human activity critically influencing aspects
of social, cultural and economic prosperity across communities. The emergence
of networked communication technologies has dropped traditional boundaries
in H.E. allowing bringing together geographically dispersed learners and
giving them opportunities to redefine their shared understanding of a
given discipline as well as a shared sense of their complex roles as developing
professionals. Increasing attention is being paid to the ways in which
values, beliefs, experiences and knowledge are being shared and negotiated
among groups of learners in formal educational settings. Networked learning
in particular, provides a range of collaborative learning arrangements
that include a broad variety of networked computer technologies and has
become a useful context for knowledge construction in H.E. What is interesting
in exploring knowledge construction learning communities is placed on
discussions pointing to the distinction between the creation of collaborative
knowledge and possibilities for learning emerging from such initiatives.
There is also a need for research on the ways in which the experiences
gained from collaboration are used to deal with emerging learning situations,
e.g. those met while preparing assignments and project reports as part
of a formal course of study. The process of collaborative knowledge construction
often involves cycles of developmental activity in which participants
engage including decisions about what is worth to be added to the knowledge
of a learning community. As a useful conceptual tool for researching the
process of knowledge construction in networked learning, we propose the
notions of epistemic activity and epistemic fluency. The epistemic ideas,
we argue, work as a useful framework to give meaning and to refine collaborative
discussion prone to the generation of new knowledge.
This work-in-progress paper develops the conceptual background for researching
knowledge construction in networked learning and examines learners'
participation in knowledge advancement activities both collaboratively
and individually through the lens of qualitative methodology. Learners'
participation in knowledge construction activities is investigated using
an analytical framework originating from the data and ideas guided by
the theoretical framework of the study. Data have been collected from
a postgraduate course in Advanced Learning Technology including online
discussions, student assignments and interviews.
The paper concludes that the ideas expressed within online messages exchanged
between course participants as well as research projects and reviews undertaken
as part of their assessment are representations of abstract knowledge.
Epistemic activities have a decisive role in knowledge creation and improvement
as they add value to such representations. Participation in epistemic
activities inherent in a professional culture or discipline (i.e. through
answering important questions, solving out problems and adding to its
knowledge base) allows gradually becoming an active valued practitioner
of this culture and generally develops one's epistemic fluency. Finally,
the findings point to the importance of the contextual aspect in the process
of knowledge construction and epistemic fluency acquisition pointing to
the fact that knowledge can be advanced through interaction of the individual
with the environment including peer learners, tutors and available resources.
The ability to create and refine knowledge while maintaining a set of
relations between other learners, resources and communities has implications
for learning. Connectivity is crucial to that extend. In that respect,
networked learning needs to be redefined to emphasise the dynamic attributes
inherent in the connections enabled between participants and resources
which are conducive to the emergence of shared and new knowledge. The
implications for transformational learning found in such initiatives remain
to be further explored.
Full Paper - .pdf
Networked Learning - a social practice perspective
Chris Jones
Institute of Educational Technology, Open University, UK. c.r.jones@open.ac.uk
Abstract
This paper proposes a social practice perspective on networked learning.
Networked learning doesn't privilege any particular view of learning
and the paper does not claim any special status for a social practice
view but it sets out a clear agenda and demarcation for this area of study.
The suggestion is that social practice can provide a theoretical lens
that allows researchers to examine networked learning in ways that other
perspectives do not and that a social practice approach is especially
appropriate for research focused on the kinds of changes that are taking
place around what has been termed Web 2.0.
The term social practice has been developed in relation to commonly used
meanings of practice and other available alternatives in academic discourse.
It is suggested that social practice should not be viewed as an exclusive
or singular perspective. Instead it is suggested that social practice
is particularly suitable for examining certain levels of activity in relation
to learning and networked learning specifically. Social practice offers
a materialist account that places an emphasis on externalities and artefacts
rather than processes of learning that take place within the 'head'
either as brain functions or as cognitive processes of the mind. This
materialist emphasis also stands in contrast to some cultural accounts
of practice that emphasise discourse at the expense of other factors.
In order to illustrate the kinds of issues that a social practice perspective
can assist in researching an account is provided of those aspects that
make networked learning a distinct research area. This is then focused
on two issues in particular, the place of artefacts in learning and the
role of affordances.
It can be argued that artefacts have always played a role in learning
related to the externalisation of information. In early periods of human
development memory and the oral tradition dominated learning and the practices
that supported learning. An ability to memorise exactly what was handed
on was a key element in preserving and disseminating knowledge and tradition.
In later periods the written language provided a repository of knowledge
in texts and knowledge and learning were related to the specialist skills
of reading, writing, mathematics and arithmetic. Learning still retained
a large component of memorisation and repetition as the means to store
and reproduce texts were extremely limited. In the modern era with the
advent of print technologies texts could be produced and reproduced with
much greater ease and reading and writing skills were spread more widely
in society. Increasingly memorisation became less important and the ability
to understand and deploy conceptual knowledge became more central. This
material account of learning as a history of the relationship between
social knowing and the technological means available to support social
practices provides a backdrop to the central argument of this paper.
Networked technologies provide a new set of possibilities that can affect
the forms of practice that support knowing and learning. These technologies
shift traditional conceptions of time and place and make available large
quantities of traditional texts alongside new forms of reification that
preserve what has previously been peripheral and ephemeral. Digital technologies
shift the boundary between externalising information and externalising
cognitive processes. Increasingly those processing and conceptual skills
once important to education and learning are delegated to machines and
services supplied over the network. The current phase of development captured
by the phrase Web 2.0 arguably reasserts the primacy of process over content
in that what is externalised is a part of a process that relies on engagement
and participation to add value in the system. That is the value for learning
does not lie in the technology, nor in content supplied by a central service,
rather it lies in the emergent properties arising through the aggregation
of many parts in which the whole becomes greater than the sum of its parts.
Full Paper - .pdf
The Metaphor of Patchworking as a Viable Concept in Developing Networked
Learning?
Thomas Ryberg
Department of Communication and Psychology, Aalborg University, ryberg@hum.aau.dk
Abstract
The aim of this paper is to explore the notion of networked learning
and to further develop the theoretical and methodological concepts within
this area of research. It does so through introducing the metaphor of
patchworking as a way of understanding and investigating learning processes
and by discussing how this particular perspective might inform networked
learning. The metaphor has emerged from a detailed interactional study
of a short, intensive learning process in which eight young people (age
13-16) worked collaboratively with an open-ended problem. Throughout the
process the learners were co-located, but their work was heavily mediated
by and dependent on ICT in the form of e.g. tablet-PC's, video-cameras,
mini-discs, internet access and the use of various software applications.
Furthermore, the learners were put in contact with 'experts'
and other resource persons, whom they could interview and discuss with
- also they were given a 30 minutes lecture by local researchers.
The notion of metaphorically understanding learning as a process of patchworking
encompasses for one thing a particular view of learning, but also it suggests
specific ways of analytically approaching learning processes. It suggests
that we can metaphorically view learning as processes of creating or stitching
a patchwork by assembling and continuously reorganising multiple patches
and pieces into a 'final' patchwork. Furthermore, it suggests
that it is not the 'final patchwork' in and of itself, which
should be the object of analysis. Rather, the analytic focus is to investigate
how, when and why various 'patches and pieces' (or resources)
such as ideas, arguments, pictures or web-texts are stitched together
into provisional patchworks, which are combined, reorganised, negotiated
and assembled into a 'final' patchwork. In the paper some
of the analytic concepts, methods and theoretical ideas will be discussed
in relation to a particular interpretation of networked learning. The
discussion will revolve around the view of learning in networked learning
and how networked learning provides another perspective than other ideas
and fields. Also, the paper will discuss the nature of the case, as the
case is different from what is often the object of study within the area
of networked learning. In spite of this the paper will argue that the
insights gained from the study can feed into and contribute to theory
and methodology within the area of networked learning.
An important concept in the particular interpretation of 'networked
learning' discussed in the paper is the notion of promoting connections
- both between learners, between learners and teachers, but also
connecting people with 'resources'. This paper argues that
the learning is not only located in the 'connections' or 'interactions'
between the entities. Rather, it is located in a flow of activities, and
the paper argues that the metaphor of understanding learning as a process
of patchworking can enhance the analytic focus of network learning. An
important part of metaphorically understanding learning as a process of
patchworking, is the analytic focus on studying flows of activities and
closely inspecting how connections to other people and resources come
to shape and form the learning process and the construction of knowledge.
Full Paper - .pdf
Bridging Networked Learning between the Knowledge Economy and Higher Education:
A Philosophical Approach
Gale Parchoma1, and Mary Dykes2
Lancaster University1, University of Saskatchewan2
g.parchoma@lancaster.ac.uk, mary.dykes@usask.ca
Abstract
McLuhan (1964) predicted that the future of work would involve learning
a living. Information technology would merge production, consumption and
learning into an automated process. This process of automation would result
in a global learning society. A growing body of evidence suggests that
McLuhan's prediction of the emergence of a global learning society
has been realized and its knowledge economy (KE) has become a catalyst
forcing complex socioeconomic and educational issues to the fore in public
and private organizations and in higher education.
The KE has a constant, even insatiable need for a well-educated, continuously
learning, and networked workforce, which can efficiently produce information,
knowledge, and innovation. The rapid pace of change in the KE quickly
depreciates knowledge workers' expertise which must continuously be updated
with structured formal and informal education and training offered at
educational institutions or through professional programs, and unstructured
informal education and training, such as life skills learned at home,
work, and in the community. This process of continuous learning, training
and re-training, is called lifelong learning.
Knowledge workers' lifelong learning needs have resulted in an emergent
category of higher education learners, who typically need to simultaneously
balance career and family commitments with formal participation in higher
education. Universities have responded to the needs of this group through
introducing a variety of non-traditional delivery modes, including networked
learning (NL).
NL has been heralded as a technological innovation, capable of transforming
learning and globalizing higher education, and has been critiqued as a
commercial venture into mass commodification and impoverishment of higher
learning. In this paper, we argue that the process involved in learning
in both the knowledge economy and in higher education can be reclaimed
as a human process that uses technology as a tool, rather than a process
that is driven by the technology itself.
We focus on the process of connections that occur in NL via using information
technology to link learners, tutors, and learning resources. We propose
that NL can be developed and facilitated with an ethic of care for learners
in both the KE and higher education within the traditions of academic
culture and values through judicious structural, cultural, economic, and
pedagogic adaptations within institutions of higher education.
Drawing on the literature of learner-centred instructional design, networked
learning, networked learning communities, and ecological learning environments,
we reclaim pedagogical discourses from their misuse in the "cyberlibertarian
rhetoric of mass commodification" (Greener & Perriton, 2005)
associated with globalization of NL in higher education. We posit a philosophy
of democratic approaches to NL pedagogy, which may bridge knowledge workers'
learning experiences in higher education to critical, reflective participation
in distributed communities of practice within the knowledge economy.
Full Paper - .pdf
The Tyranny of Participation and Collaboration in Networked Learning
Debra Ferreday and Vivien Hodgson
ICR and DMLL, Lancaster University, d.ferreday@lancaster,ac.uk and v.hodgson@lancaster.ac.uk
Abstract
It has increasingly become the case that the ideas underpinning the
concept and theory of networked learning have moved on from the 'original'
definition to ones that assume a major benefit offered by NL from a learning
perspective is the opportunities for collaboration and participation in
the learning process. As it has evolved, networked learning has come to
emphasise the importance of the collaborative learning aspects and possibilities
of learning in online spaces (McConnell 2000, Steeples and Jones 2002).
In particular, the concept of collaboration is almost universally assumed
to be an unquestionably desirable aspect of this type of learning. In
this paper, we suggest that such a utopian view of participation which
does not acknowledge the 'dark side' of participation in learning
that else where in the literature authors such as Reynolds (1998) and
Brookfield (1994), amongst others, have identified as an important issue.
This paper therefore examines more closely some of the darker sides of
participation. We suggest that the tendency to view collaboration as universally
good can in some cases be experienced as normative. This, we argue, creates
a form of tyranny in which participation, rather than achieving a liberating
effect can become (albeit often with the best intentions) an instrument
of domination which some learners may experience as oppressive and controlling.
We argue this is most likely to be the case in the absence of reflexivity
and understanding of different ways and approaches to participation.
We go on to identify some of the forms this tyranny can take in practice;
these include the operational constraints of the institutional context;
the failure to recognise the impact of different, changing and multiple
identities of individuals on their choices about how (and whether) to
participate; and failure to reflect on the ways in which ideals of participation
result in the adopting largely unrecognized practices of inclusion and
exclusion. All these examples starkly illustrate how harmful a naïvely
utopian model of participation can be in practice. They illustrate that
participation and collaboration is no romantic ideal and what's
more has the potential to undermine learning if not considered from a
less utopian perspective.
In the paper we suggest an alternative and potentially more productive
perspective is, after Foucault, a heterotopian one. A perspective that
acknowledges and assumes disruption and which disturbs our customary notion
of ourselves. Participation in heterotopian spaces is disturbing and ambiguous,
but it offers a space in which to imagine, to act, and to desire differently.
We try to illustrate through a particular example the potential that
participative processes have to be experienced as tyrannical when participation
is demanded in an unreflective and normative way. The example given demonstrates
how a rigid invocation of community norms around the notion of support
led to frustration and tension which resulted in not only the marginalisation
of one individual but also experienced as a threat to the ideal of a learning
community for a number of the participants. We suggest that rather than
pursue participation in this both utopian and inflexible fashion that
a less tyrannical alternative is to expect and anticipate that participation
will be disruptive and encompass difference and variety. That is, in a
way that reflects a heterotopian rather than utopian view of participation.
A heterotopian view of participation acknowledges that it may well and
often does test our customary notions of ourselves but at the same time
in doing so offers the possibility of heterotopian spaces to imagine and
desire differently, not in a utopian, normative or comfortable sense but
in a heterotopian, often disturbing and disruptive sense.
Full Paper - .pdf
<back
|